download436 view899
twitter facebook

CC_BYThis item is licensed Creative Commons License

dc.contributor.author
Muzammil Tahira
dc.contributor.author
Alinda, Alias Rose
dc.contributor.author
Arayti, Bakri
dc.contributor.author
Ani, Shabri
dc.date.accessioned
2018-10-12T04:51:14Z
dc.date.available
2018-10-12T04:51:14Z
dc.date.issued
2014-12-31
dc.identifier.issn
2287-9099
dc.identifier.uri
https://repository.kisti.re.kr/handle/10580/8667
dc.description.abstract
This study examines the foremost concerns related to most noted research performance index. The most popular and widely acceptable h-index underestimates the highly visible scientist, the middle order group, due to citation distribution issues. The study addresses this issue and uses 'Corrected Quality Ratio' (CQ) to check the implicit underpinnings as evident in h-index. CQ helps to incorporate the aspects of a good research performance indicator. This simple revision performs more intimately and logically to gauge the broader research impact for all groups and highly visible scientists with less statistical error.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.relation.ispartofseries
Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice
dc.title
h-index, h-type Indices, and the Role of Corrected Quality Ratio
dc.type
Article
dc.rights.license
CC_BY
dc.identifier.doi
10.1633/JISTaP.2014.2.4.2
dc.citation.endPage
30
dc.citation.number
4
dc.citation.startPage
20
dc.citation.volume
2
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation
vol. 2, no. 4, page. 20 - 30
dc.subject.keyword
Scientometric
dc.subject.keyword
Research Performance Evaluation
dc.subject.keyword
Corrected Quality Ratio
dc.subject.keyword
h-index
dc.subject.keyword
H'
dc.subject.keyword
h-cpp
dc.subject.keyword
g-index
dc.subject.keyword
R-index
dc.subject.keyword
A-index
dc.subject.keyword
m-index
dc.subject.keyword
q2-index
dc.rights.holder
KISTI
Appears in Collections:
8. KISTI 간행물 > JISTaP > Vol. 2 - No. 4
Files in This Item:
Thumbnail E1JSCH_2014_v2n4_20.pdf314.33 kBDownload

Browse