download437 view1,025
twitter facebook

CC_BYThis item is licensed Creative Commons License

dc.contributor.author
Boryung Ju
dc.contributor.author
Daniel O. O'Connor
dc.date.accessioned
2018-10-12T04:51:08Z
dc.date.available
2018-10-12T04:51:08Z
dc.date.issued
2013-06-30
dc.identifier.issn
2287-4577
dc.identifier.uri
https://repository.kisti.re.kr/handle/10580/8631
dc.description.abstract
Relevance has a long history of scholarly investigation and discussion in information science. One of its notable concepts is that of 'user-based' relevance. The purpose of this study is to examine how users construct their perspective on the concept of relevance; to analyze what the constituent elements (facets) of relevance are, in terms of core-periphery status; and to compare the difference of constructions of two groups of users (information users vs. information professionals) as applied with a social representations theory perspective. Data were collected from 244 information users and 123 information professionals through use of a free word association method. Three methods were employed to analyze data: (1) content analysis was used to elicit 26 categories (facets) of the concept of relevance; (2) structural analysis of social representations was used to determine the core-periphery status of those facets in terms of coreness, sum of similarity, and weighted frequency; and, (3) maximum tree analysis was used to present and compare the differences between the two groups. Elicited categories in this study overlap with the ones from previous relevance studies, while the findings of a core-periphery analysis show that Topicality, User-needs, Reliability/Credibility, and Importance are configured as core concepts for the information user group, while Topicality, User-needs, Reliability/Credibility, and Currency are core concepts for the information professional group. Differences between the social representations of relevance revealed that Topicality was similar to User-needs and to Importance. Author is closely related to Title while Reliability/Credibility is linked with Currency. Easiness/Clarity is similar to Accuracy. Overall, information users and professionals function with a similar social collective of shared meanings for the concept of relevance. The overall findings identify the core and periphery concepts of relevance and their relationships in terms of coreness, similarity, and weighted frequency.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.relation.ispartofseries
Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice
dc.title
Beyond Categories: A Structural Analysis of the Social Representations of Information Users' Collective Perceptions on 'Relevance'
dc.type
Article
dc.rights.license
CC_BY
dc.identifier.doi
10.1633/JISTaP.2013.1.2.2
dc.citation.endPage
35
dc.citation.number
2
dc.citation.startPage
16
dc.citation.volume
1
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation
vol. 1, no. 2, page. 16 - 35
dc.subject.keyword
Social Representations Theory
dc.subject.keyword
Structural analysis
dc.subject.keyword
Relevance
dc.subject.keyword
Information users' collective perceptions
dc.subject.keyword
Core-periphery analysis
dc.subject.keyword
Similarity analysis
dc.rights.holder
KISTI
Appears in Collections:
8. KISTI 간행물 > JISTaP > Vol. 1 - No. 2
Files in This Item:
Thumbnail E1JSCH_2013_v1n2_16.pdf470.99 kBDownload

Browse